You need to be a member of composersforum to add comments!
This reply was deleted.
Dealing with Criticism as a Composer
Started by Guy Shahar
Do We Need Music Theory
Started by Guy Shahar
Are these double stops playable?
Started by Guy Shahar
This Forum
Started by Rowy
Topics by Tags
- music (2)
- winter (1)
- upload (1)
- title (1)
- the (1)
- styles (1)
- student (1)
- strings (1)
- seo (1)
Monthly Archives
2025
- January (3)
2024
- December (3)
- November (2)
- October (4)
- September (3)
- August (4)
- July (4)
- June (3)
- May (5)
- April (4)
- March (2)
- February (6)
- January (2)
2023
- December (9)
- November (10)
- October (10)
- September (23)
Replies
there are two types of theory -- one concerns the practical business of what is possible or comfortable to play in the real world, assuming that composition is designed for live performance by real musicians which is far from invariably the case nowadays. Sample libraries can only sample what is physically playable so using them, you can't compose stuff which is out of range though transitions may be too fast to be feasible, depending on the level of the performers.
The second type of theory is more about analysis -- such things as harmony and counterpoint were very useful in the days before you could get instant feedback through virtual instruments and some forum members find it useful to use theory as a basis for experimenting with musical ideas. I don't, and don't believe you can make dogmatic statements on that which you indeed carefully avoid in your film. You also make the point that those who compose purely according to theory are unlikely to produce anything individual or interesting if there is no personal vision. On the other hand, some knowledge of the tradition, however assimilated, is certainly useful for producing works which will be appreciated by others.
Thank you, David. That's an interesting and useful distinction between the 2 aspects of theory.