Well then, I want to ask for some feedback on this symphonic work (still in progress). I named it for the moment "Waldszenen / Forest Scenes" - synonymously for some of the moods in it. The "end" is the beginning of the part following, I'll write it as a fugato. Do you think the development is understandable? Do the "weird" parts fit to the rest! Is it worth to continue? Or whatsoever you think it's worth to be criticized.
Many thanks in advance!
Replies
Simon Wiedemann said:
Fredrick zinos said:
Salvin Cransby said:
Ann Rodela said:
Thank you for asking my opinion. I regard yours highly and it is an hour to be a composer-freind. I would like to echo what has already been said about the piece. You should continue with it. Could it be more extreme in loudness, ppp, fff? Extreme in the moods/imagery you have used? Could the whole orchestra play a single melody? It's a great piece and really engaging to listen too. It truely stands on it's own and is highly considered, full of colour and highly conducive to imagery. The title appears to need to change. I like the Forest metaphor, but this feels a little cliched, but does capture a sense of space, journey, character/form. The music sounds more universal if that makes sense!
All the very best
matt
Hi Rudi, this work is certainly worth continuing. It contains beautiful pastoral images, humor scenes, contrasting instrument combinations, rhythms and harmonies. As to the critique (although not too constructive), you should develop the music form. It is not entirely clear for me (I perceive several beautiful fragments without dramatic development). I think you have 2 options: a) remain in pastoral environment, like in 2th movement of Beethoven's 6th, and add something unexpected, e.g. nightingale or echoes; b) to grow a strength to a distinctive culmination. Both "a" and "b" can be implemented. Once more, the sound textures are very attractive.