Did you ever dabble with any drugs and find that your compositions improved ?
I am including all legal and illegal, from caffeine upwards.
Does a cigarette help you to concentrate.
Did you write a great tune while stoned ?
And listen back to it the next day and decide it was garbage ?
Didn't the Beatles' music improve after they discovered weed (Rubber Soul) and LSD (Sgt Pepper etc) ?
Did composers of the classical period get high in German coffee parlours ?
You need to be a member of Composers' Forum to add comments!
Replies
However, it could be said that once you've taken certain drugs you're never the same person again.
I'd like to say that I think slightly differently now as a result of what I did in the past and that in turn influences my musical output.
For me the experience was an awakening, but for others it is just a case of feeling mildly drowsy.
http://www.myspace.com/pissketti
The psychedelic experience has certainly inflluenced some of my compositions. I like to make subjects melt away into swirling colors at times.
This may annoy people but it is easy to doodle around on an instrument, write a jazz head, get a groove going, jam, play around with your DAW, while you're under the influence of whatever. But symphonic or large scale orchestral or indeed chamber music requires all the powers of concentration at your disposal. There's no doubt things may sound better when you're zonked but your jokes seem funnier too. LOL
You might be able to jot down an idea or two while high, but when it comes to the finer details I can imagine anyone being able to do that, or at least to it to the best of their ability.
There are also people like Jimi Hendrix and a whole host of others in "low" art. Could we imagine the music of the 1960s without the drug influence ?
Which is kind of ironic considering that his partner Yoko Ono did performances wailing and barking in a bag.
I think that there is a secret history concerning drugs and music. Because the topic is controversial. we don't really know which "moments of inspiration" which seem to define great music were produced under the influence.
I'm probably talking more recent times, and I'm not suggesting that JS Bach wrote the Chaconne in D minor whilst stoned.
--My Theory--
Drugs could help you understand things better if you get so good at composing that you don't have to think about the difference between what you hear and what you write, that it just happens...as writing english does. Even then it would only be good for sketching ideas I think, not by any stretch full on final copy orchestrations. Kind of goes to what kris said about not exceeding what you actually got.
About habitual users: what you and they (the audience) feel ain't the same, if you are always screwed up you're in a different place than they and are unable to really connect...unless they are habitual users.
I actually used to have a bit of a problem (that's the beauty of using a screen name that is not my real name, I can come out with this stuff). I stopped a little over two years ago. Magically, about a year and a half ago I started composing again and have been cranking em out like never before, and my compositions are ten times better now. I have written 4 multi-movement works, recorded a "concept album", and several short chamber pieces since May of 2009. Coincidence? Perhaps...probably not.
However, during my A'levels, myself and my fellow music students would throw the occasional party where we would all bring our instruments, and jam through the night under the influence of many things, mainly alcohol, amphetamines, cannabis and sometimes even magic mushrooms (not useful for jamming). I personally found myself, under the influence of alcohol and speed able to improvise very well on the piano and drums, purely because of the confidence and energy provided for me by these substances.
But for serious orchestral composition, it has to be a clear head. No question.