About the Music above...
The three middle pieces on the playlist up there are more or less pop music. Some of it is pretty experimental though, so don't discredit it automatically!!
Thanks for listening!
Notes for 016
This piece of music is essentially a work of minimalism. I have heard the term 'post-minimalism' applied before, and perhaps this fits that description, as it is not as repetitive as traditional minimal works. Essentially, I have taken a rather limited set of pitches and ran them through several different techniques and variations. This initial set is the set [0, 1, 6] (hence the title) and is most often expressed as the pitches C, Db, and F#. This set outlines the chord relationship from which the whole piece is derived. (F# major to C major)
The piece starts with a statement of two themes. The first is initially expressed using chromatic planing, and is heard unharmonized later. The second theme is derived from the triads of F# major and C Major.
After this expository section, both themes are developed. This development begins with a section of two part counterpoint, using the first theme as a motive. Many techniques have been used to create this section (sequence, imitation, invertible counterpoint etc.) which is aurally, probably the most difficult. During this section, listen for the theme, its everywhere!
As we progress, the complex counterpoint 'degrades', becoming more and more repetitive turning into a simple ostinato(derived from our initial set) in preparation for the return of the second theme. The second theme comes back over the ostinato, and trades back and forth with the first theme.
The ending is a collision of the two themes. In the bass, there is a hint of the first theme, as the second theme rings out above, then a portion of the first theme comes back briefly before the final thunderous chord, which is a polychord built from F# major and C major. There is a hint of resolution to F#, but the very last sound heard is again, our set [0, 1, 6]
Comment Wall (19 comments)
You need to be a member of Composers' Forum to add comments!
Join this Ning Network
Pleased to meet another music student! I'm very interested in your music. I've only just delved into modern music composition, and I can't quite pull it off without it sounding superficial, so I'm just going to study it some more for a while. I'll check in on your works often. :)
Thanks for your comment. I like your music to, especially Velorution I and ambients. Velorution is a single piece or it's the first movement of a more large piece?
Thanks for the comment, and thanks for taking some time to listen. As to calling my work a symphony, I realize it does not fit the classical definition of the word, but in the sense that it is a long work in four movements I think the description fits. It is my musical take on the idea I suppose. As for not having much structure, you're right! This was my first attempt at something that long, and at a multi-movement piece alltogether. So, thank you for the criticism I really appreciate it.
Also, I stopped to listen to some of your music. I fear that the theory that must be involved to create music like yours would be far over my head. You've got a great sound, and it's great to hear someone who plays some of the same instruments I do in such a different way. Congrats.
Soon after, I was listening to a fantastic Veena player, S. Balachander, who created music in the cultural context of classical music of southern India. So, you see, I disagree with your sweeping generalizations about Eastern or Western sensibilities. I think you've been brain-washed. Today, European music is enjoyed in Japan. Music is quite universal. The evidence is everywhere. It's a small world. As I said, you designed those movements of NDLO to be static. Granted, not perfectly static -there ARE subtle changes, and the structures are interesting. My point is that you are throwing away the emotional aspect of music composition. That's just my opinion. It is debatable whether or not music can be created that induces an entirely unique emotional experience, -an experience that is unlike any and all natural events or social interactions.
...where did I say that there was no emotional content? I agree that there are changes in emotion between your movements. I stand by my point- that each movement is quite static, in the way it affects (my) emotions.
What effect do you wish to achieve for the listener? How do you want this piece, NDLO,
to affect people? How do you feel about the static quality? Is it your intended effect? Is it your intention to induce agitation, followed by energetic discomfort?
Anger is an emotion, while 'Spiteful' is not. 'Adventurous' is also not an emotion. Euphoria is.
Dissonance and complexity of rhythm are... virtues? Why? Did your cultural environment teach you that? I see dissonance and complexity as means to an end, but not an end in itself.
It is important that you realize there exists the universality of biology/emotion. For example, facial expressions are associated with specific attitudes and emotions, universally, or at least globally. Music often DOES affect people in the same way. Beethoven's 6th does really feel like a jaunt into the bucolic countryside. A feeling is conveyed. You, the composer, are the conveyer.
View All Comments