Composers' Forum

Music Composers Unite!

My new composition, when I Started writing this, I dont have idea for what it is.. I writing this just for fun.

After finished I think its good for trailer film or Tv programs :D..

Comented welcome :)

https://soundcloud.com/maer-d-teg/hangouts

Thanks

Views: 532

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

@Bob Hi Bob

Thanks for commented.. 

Until now i finished nearly 30 music.. but i never make more than 4-5 minutes music..

I still training and learning, and i hope next time i can make a longer pieces music..

thanks

Fun piece, easily fits with a trailer or soundtrack, I can personally see this working in a lot of video game music so you could think about contacting some indie video game makers and seeing if they want to use your music.

I think the orchestration could do with some more variety in instrumentation. An orchestra is like a big toy box of different instruments and it's main strength is the different sound combinations and sheer size for things like dynamics, the former being more relevant. This sort of thing is pretty easy to fit in just take your main themes and put them elsewhere in the orchestra, i.e maybe the 2nd time you here the main theme it's on woodwind or brass. You can get a lot of mileage that way and it helps pad out the length of a song if thats something you are struggling with.

You have a nice thing going at the beginning with the added percussion and I'm not suggesting you fill every part of the song with extra instruments. It's a tough balancing act sometimes but if you take a step back from your composition and consider the different options and pick a few to explore it's a lot easier to manage. 

Thanks for sharing

Is that a bow tie you're wearing, or did your mustache fall down?

what this piece needs is an agent... Barry Manilow step aside...

this is Copland at the Cabana.
 
Insult Composer said:

This piece needs just one little thing to give it that finishing touch.....a paper shredder.

@Alex Hi Alex Thanks for comented and your advice

@Bob @Dave @Roger btw Idont understand what happen in here :p 

Hi Gailh 

No problem, hope you understand I'm just trying to be constructive as this forum is designed for I just feel with text tone is hard to convey, and it's super easy to just say "you can do this and that" and much harder to do. Composition is such a nebulous process. I'll keep a look out for more of your work.

All the best

Alex



Galih Setiawan said:

@Alex Hi Alex Thanks for comented and your advice

@Bob @Dave @Roger btw Idont understand what happen in here :p 

Teg,

     Guess I owe you an explanation.  A few days ago one of my favorite American comedians, Don Rickles died.  He made a career of insulting Hollywood stars.  I took the occasion to do a little tribute to him by putting up his picture and mimicking his shtick.  I think most people got it, but if you are not of a certain age or American you have probably never heard of Don Rickles.  Anyway it was meant in good fun.  

     I enjoyed you piece though I have no idea of your method of composing without a score.  Thanks for posting.
 
Galih Setiawan said:

@Alex Hi Alex Thanks for comented and your advice

@Bob @Dave @Roger btw Idont understand what happen in here :p 

Now there's a REAL insult. and personal attack.

Hardly in the 'spirit' of Rickles though. If you don't get it...

you just don't get it.
 
Ray said:

Keep digging.

I liked Chuck Berry rock but I haven't gone looking for sex with children.

You are an idiot and now you apologise for others not knowing your intentions instead of just offering a simple personal apology for your crassness on multiple boards.

Ray

Dave, YOU ASSume that Galih was offended? or did he privately confide this to you?

You, Mr. C word  who, as I remember, insulted the forum with what YOU percieved as

an everyday expression. Now you tame it down a bit and use the word 'twat'.

I remember you defending your use of the word, while still others found it offensive.

Lets not provoke gestapho Greg here, but I'm hearing self righteous politically correct

hypocracy. And then Ray condemns Lawrence's supposed insult with an insult and

'personal ' attack? 

Personally, I don't care what language someone uses to express a point.

I try to see the 'gist' of the message/communication, no matter what the

mentality level.

If a genius tells a dirty joke to others, is he any less a genius?

Humor, even deplorable humor, is much more sane and acceptable to me,

as opposed to the pathetic hypocracy of those PC police that have no clue

but to hide behind the drama of condemnation of others.     RS


 
Dave Dexter said:

The people who were insulted are in the wrong for not understanding the reference? You think there was no grounds for a new forum member or one unfamiliar with whatever performance art tribute Lawrence was attempting to be genuinely offended, confidence damaged, and confused all at once? And that if they were, they should simply have "got it"?

roger stancill said:

Now there's a REAL insult. and personal attack.

Hardly in the 'spirit' of Rickles though. If you don't get it...

you just don't get it.
 
Ray said:

Keep digging.

I liked Chuck Berry rock but I haven't gone looking for sex with children.

You are an idiot and now you apologise for others not knowing your intentions instead of just offering a simple personal apology for your crassness on multiple boards.

Ray

Dave, grounds for offense? that is subjective farce.

Why do you want to be hall monitor? Is it a teacher's pet fetish?

What level of sophisication shall we deem to be the acceptable medium here?

If a tree falls in the woods and no one hears it, does it make a sound?

My guess is that Galih was more confused by the reaction you and Ray

put forth, than by a single opinion/comment offered  by Rickles/ Lawrence.

Anyway, I knew immediately that Captain Insult was being facetious and

meant no malicious harm, but then, I am not a Drama Queen.    RS

Ya lost me there Dave, you must remember that I am merely a 'give a shit' rube who

enjoys bantering inane tripe just for the sport of it.

Sorry bro', there is no such thing as objective offense.

Offense exists in the realm of the ego, which is subjective.

Therein lies the telling insight into much of human interaction.

Greater than... less than... equal to. ( < = <) .

This simple formula is a key to balance and stability.

This is why people always want to get 'even'.

This is why you(we all) need to understand the meaning of the

concept of 'grace'. Give it a try, and be a peace maker.
 
Dave Dexter said:

You're very slow. This didn't just happen to Galih's music and I never assumed any reaction on his part.

You're trying to make a case out of "grounds for offense" being a subjective farce, but you entirely acknowledge my usage of the word "cunt" as offensive, so you clearly understand the concept of offense being objective. You don't think any of the insults placed were offensive? How about this: I was offended, being an empathic organism, at what I interpreted as an often argumentative and hostile member simply abandoning subtlety and trying to offend people. Lawrence left a bunch of insults on various different pieces of music, without context or explanation. You are working extremely hard to downplay something which you would have been highly unimpressed with from me.

If being hall monitor in this instance means calling out the actions of twats, I'm happy with that. But, of course, you're trying to hall monitor the hall monitor for much less convincing reasons. You're such a drama queen, reacting to this degree.

roger stancill said:

Dave, grounds for offense? that is subjective farce.

Why do you want to be hall monitor? Is it a teacher's pet fetish?

What level of sophisication shall we deem to be the acceptable medium here?

If a tree falls in the woods and no one hears it, does it make a sound?

My guess is that Galih was more confused by the reaction you and Ray

put forth, than by a single opinion/comment offered  by Rickles/ Lawrence.

Anyway, I knew immediately that Captain Insult was being facetious and

meant no malicious harm, but then, I am not a Drama Queen.    RS

Anyway, I knew immediately that Captain Insult was being facetious and

meant no malicious harm, but then, I am not a Drama Queen.    RS

Roger,

When I first read Mr.Insult, my immediate reaction was that Lawrences' account had been hacked and I was quite perturbed by the crassness of the comments. I half expected a post from the moderators on Lawrences' behalf, exonerating him. When I and others had worked out it was Lawrence, I still had a hard time believing it was him. It was only when he admitted as such that I thought that was not funny, nor appropriate, nor prudent to assume the rest of the (world wide) forum would get it. A simple notification of his hommage to Rickles would have done the trick. I even wondered about who the avatar was, but without context, had nothing to go on.

There are grounds for offence to be taken and if the comments would have been aimed at me, I would have been upset by them and mightily pissed off.

Honestly Roger, your animosity to Dave is such that if he posted that  America is a great country, you'd still probably argue against him. 

Hey there Mike, I had no idea that Insult Guy had gone on an across the 'boards' rampage.

None the less, I saw Rickles picture(avatar) and knew immediately what to expect.

Rickles was a comedian. A somewhat deplorable comic, with a twisted schtick, that was geared

towards pot shot insults. Many other comedians do similar' stuff' as a part of their routines. So what.

Rickles made it to Vegas and was 'in it' for the laughs. Vegas does not hire failures. Apparently there

actually were people that thought he was funny.

I saw that he had died. (No loss in my world.) Yet, I knew what Rickles was all about... as to say,

I got it,     but that does not mean that I would ever buy a ticket to his show.

My beef is more the the PC police that read it 'literally' and then condemned the post with an actual

personal attack and insult to the Insult Guy. Isn't that somewhat hypocritical?

Dave must have thought that my earlier comment was aimed at him, by his response. It wasn't.

As a matter of fact, I was shocked and surprised at Ray's comment.

Then, when Lawrence 'fessed up' and explained his position- which I thought was sincerely

delivered,   That too got shot down and insulted.

If the original comment was aimed at me, I would have seen it for what it was and not been

'pissed off' in the slightest. I 'get' the many different levels of humor. I do not jump on the drama

bandwagon or take any of this so seriously.

Also, how in the world is this forum a 'world forum' that ALL will see and read???   With 7.5 billion

people on the planet, this thread has, at present, 299 views, Many of them are the same few people.

Let's keep things in a sane and realistic perspective and not feed the Drama Queens.    RS



Mike Hewer said:

Anyway, I knew immediately that Captain Insult was being facetious and

meant no malicious harm, but then, I am not a Drama Queen.    RS

Roger,

When I first read Mr.Insult, my immediate reaction was that Lawrences' account had been hacked and I was quite perturbed by the crassness of the comments. I half expected a post from the moderators on Lawrences' behalf, exonerating him. When I and others had worked out it was Lawrence, I still had a hard time believing it was him. It was only when he admitted as such that I thought that was not funny, nor appropriate, nor prudent to assume the rest of the (world wide) forum would get it. A simple notification of his hommage to Rickles would have done the trick. I even wondered about who the avatar was, but without context, had nothing to go on.

There are grounds for offence to be taken and if the comments would have been aimed at me, I would have been upset by them and mightily pissed off.

Honestly Roger, your animosity to Dave is such that if he posted that  America is a great country, you'd still probably argue against him. 

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Sign up info

Read before you sign up to find out what the requirements are!

Store

© 2018   Created by Gav Brown.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service